Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction
Daniela Nascimento Silva 1, , Marília Gerhardt de Oliveira 1, Eduardo Meurer2, Maria Inês Meurer3, Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva4, Ailton Santa-Bárbara4,
1 Department of Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. Helena Willhelm de Oliveira), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2 Dentistry School, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Tubarão, SC, Brazil
3 Department of Pathology (Head: Prof. Dr. Alcíbia Helena de Azevedo Maria), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
4 Centro de Pesquisas Renato Archer (CenPRA), Campinas, SP, Brazil
Summary
Background: Selective laser sintering (SLS) and three-dimensional printing (3DP™) are rapid prototyping (RP) techniques to fabricate prototypes from biomedical images. To be used in maxillofacial surgery, these models must accurately reproduce the craniofacial skeleton.
Purpose: To analyze the capacity of SLS and 3DP™ models to reproduce craniomaxillary anatomy and their dimensional error.
Material: Dry skull, helical computed-tomography images, SLS and 3DP™ prototypes, and electronic calliper.
Methods: Tomographic images of a dry skull were manipulated with the InVesalius biomedical software. Prototypes were fabricated using SLS and 3DP™ techniques. Ten linear measurements were made on the models and compared with corresponding dry skull measurements (criterion standard) carried out with an electronic calliper.
Results: We observed a dimensional error of 2.10 and 2.67% for SLS and 3DP™ models, respectively. The models satisfactorily reproduced anatomic details, except for thin bones, small foramina and acute bone projections. The SLS prototypes showed greater dimensional precision and reproduced craniomaxillary anatomy more accurately than the 3DP™ models.
Conclusion: Both SLS and 3DP™ models provided acceptable precision and may be useful aids in most maxillofacial surgeries.
Keywords
craniofacial; precision; rapid prototyping
Full text is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518208000929